Legal Opinion

Ridgeway v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 8, 2002No. 102, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

We are tasked to clarify the scope of authority that Maryland Rule 4-345 vests in the trial court to correct illegal sentences. The petitioner, convicted of two counts of first degree assault and three counts of reckless endangerment, was initially (and erroneously) sentenced for five counts of first degree assault. Having been advised of the error, the *167trial judge recalled the parties, vacated the sentences for three of the first-degree assault charges and imposed sentences for three reckless endangerment counts. The petitioner requests that this Court consider whether the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Maryland v. KanarasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. State v. GriffithsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Fabian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Matthews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. B. SIFRIT v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Nalls & Melvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. State v. WilkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API