Volkman v. DP ASSOCIATES
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The question raised on this appeal is not whether plaintiffs proved that Carroll was a partner. That burden will be upon plaintiffs when they go to trial. The question is whether defendant carried his burden of showing there was no genuine issue as to whether Carroll was a partner. It is true that Carroll and his alleged partner, defendant McNamee, denied the existence of a partnership. Both of these defendants, however, are interested in the outcome of the lawsuit. Plaintiffs should have the opportunity to test their credibility at trial. Lee v. Shor, 10 N.C. App. 231, 178 S.E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Lee v. ShorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Lazarus v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Yancey v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- McKinnon v. CV INDUSTRIES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Best Cartage, Inc. v. Stonewall Packaging, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Bradshaw v. McElroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Warren v. Rosso and Mastracco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Ring Drug Co. v. Carolina Medicorp Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.