Legal Opinion
Rauch-Milliken International, Inc. v. Halprin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 29, 2009No. 09-CA-723PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Judge.
|2In this appeal, Rauch-Milliken International, Inc. (“Rauch-Milliken”) seeks review of the costs awarded to the prevailing parties, Jay Bernard Halprin, Tammy Osborne, and the Anderson Group (“Anderson Group”). For the following reasons, we affirm.
On October 20, 2008, trial of the underlying matter commenced. 1 On December 15, 2008, Judge Zeno entered judgment in favor of the Anderson Group, dismissing Rauch-Milliken’s lawsuit at its cost. Reasons for Judgment were not supplied.
On December 29, 2008, the Anderson Group filed a Motion to Tax Costs. Shortly after the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ross Milling Co. v. GilibertiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Copenhaver v. John Bonura & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Hall v. Excelsior Steam Laundry Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- O.K. Realty Co. v. John A. Juliani, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Delaney v. Whitney Nat. BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College v. 1732 Canal Street, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Brandner v. Staf-Rath, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State, Department of Transportation & Development v. MonteleoneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Thomas Gibson, Jr. and Barbara Gibson, Individually and on Behalf of Their Father, Thomas Gibson (D) Versus Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No 2 D/B/A East Jefferson General Hospital & Ochsner Clinic FoundationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024