Legal Opinion

Microbix Biosystems, Inc. v. Biowhittaker, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 28, 2000No. MJG-97-2525PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS

GARBIS, District Judge.

The Court has before it Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The matter has been fully briefed. The Court has considered the materials submitted by the parties, held a hearing, and had the benefit of counsel’s arguments.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Microbix Biosystems, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Microbix”) 1 brought this antitrust action against Defendants Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”), 2 BioWhittaker, Inc., and BioWhittaker Holdings, Inc. (collectively “BioWhittaker”) 3 under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Alphamed Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Arriva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2006
  2. Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. v. Actelion Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. Asahi Kasei Pharma v. ActelionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Government Employees Health Association v. Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API