Legal Opinion
In Re Microsoft Corp. Antitrust Litigation
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 4, 2002No. MDL 1332PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTZ, District Judge.
This MDL proceeding encompasses private antitrust actions instituted against Microsoft Corporation by a group of consumers and by four different competitors: Be Incorporated, Burst.com, Inc, Netscape Communications Corporation, and Sun Mi-crosystems, Inc. All of the plaintiffs have moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(c) to preclude Microsoft from relitigating 395 factual findings conclusively established in United States v. Microsoft Corporation, 84 F.Supp.2d 9 (D.D.C.1999) (findings of fact), 87 F.Supp.2d 30 (D.D.C.2000) (conclusions of law and judgment), and 97 F.Supp.2d…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- LeBlanc-Sternberg v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Liberty Media Corp. v. Vivendi Universal, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
- In Re: Microsoft Corporation Antitrust Litigation Kloth v. Microsoft Corp. Netscape Communications Corp. v. Microsoft Corp. burst.com, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. (Mdl No. 1332)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- IN RE: Microsoft Corporation Antitrust Litigation v.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- IN RE: Microsoft Corporation Antitrust Litigation v.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004