Legal Opinion

D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Marks

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 3, 1885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Plaintiff (a corporation) brought this action in the district court for Lyon county, upon a promissory note given in part-payment for a harvester and binder. The answer admitted the making and delivery of the note, and, as a counterclaim, pleaded damages from an alleged breach of a written warranty made on the sale of the machine. The facts and evidence are stated in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Plaintiff (a corporation) brought this action in the district court for Lyon county, upon a promissory note given in part-payment for a harvester and binder. The answer admitted the making and delivery of the note, and, as a counterclaim, pleaded damages from an alleged breach of a written warranty made on the sale of the machine. The facts and evidence are stated in the opinion. Upon the trial, before Webber, J., and a jury, the defendant had a verdict of “no cause of action.” Plaintiff appeals from an order refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.

Action on a promissory note for $125, dated July 19, 1880, due November 1, 1882. Answer: that the note, with two *58others which have been paid, to the amount of $212.03, were given for the price of a harvester and binder, sold July 19, 1880, by plaintiff to defendant, with this written warranty: “All our machines are warranted to be well built, of good material, and capable of cutting, if properly managed, from 10 to 15 acres per day. If, on starting a machine, it should in any way prove defective and not work well, the-purchaser shall give prompt notice to the agent from whom he purchased it,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herbrand Co. v. Lackawanna Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  2. Fairbanks v. . Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Twin City Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Durbin v. DenhamOregon Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API