Legal Opinion

Durbin v. Denham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbown, J.

The promissory note, the basis of this action, was given by one farmer to another as a part of the purchase price of a second-hand tractor. The action was defended upon the ground that the warranty of the tractor was breached, and the defendant set up a counterclaim for damages by reason thereof.'

The most serious question in the case involves the instruction of the court set forth in the statement.

It is a well-established rule of law that there is no implied warranty as to quality in the sale of second-hand machinery.

“In the sale of second-hand chattels, there is ordinarily no implied…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. McDonough v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Park v. Richardson & Boynton Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gilmore v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Taylor v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drumar Mining Co. v. Morris Ravine Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Foster v. Agri-Chem, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. J. L. Latture Equipment Co. v. Gruendler Patent Crusher & Pulverizer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Klinge v. FarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Koch v. RiceOregon Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API