Legal Opinion

Fairbanks v. . Supply Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action. The four actions were originally brought in a justice's court on notes given by the defendant for a 20-horse-power oil engine No. 132538. The notes were dated 9 June, 1914; one for $150, due 1 August, 1914; another for $128.29, due 1 September, 1914, and two for $100 each, due respectively on 1 October, 1914, and 1 November, 1914, and bearing 6 per cent interest from date. All were given under the following contract:

August 5, 1913.

TWIN CITY SUPPLY CO., LEAKSVILLE, N.C.

Items: We hereby propose to furnish and deliver f. o. b. cars at factory as follows: Less 35c. cut freight…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. DutcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Kester Bros. v. Miller Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Dr. Shoop Medicine Co. v. J. A. Mizell & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Detwiler v. DownesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Acme Harvesting Machine Co. v. GaspersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DeBruhl v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. JoyceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. H. M. Wade Manufacturing Co. v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Mishoe v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  5. Sanders v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API