Nietert v. Trentman
Indiana Supreme Court
From, the Allen Circuit Court.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
Elliott, J.
I am compelled to dissent from the conclusion reached in the prevailing opinion. There is but one point decided and that is this: A defendant may, for the pur*394pose of setting up a defence, contradict a sheriff’s return to the summons. The question is not whether a defendant may show some excuse for not obeying a summons or may be relieved on the ground of fraud, but whether he may directly contradict the sheriff’s return. The complaint does not admit service and offer an excuse for a failure to appear; on the contrary, it broadly denies service. The pleading…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Rowell v. KleinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Splahn v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Hume v. ConduittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Krug v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.