Legal Opinion

Rowell v. Klein

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 41 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskirk, J.

This was an action of replevin for the recovery of a quantity of wheat in the sheaf.

The defendant answered by the general denial.

The cause was submitted to a jury for trial and resulted in a finding for the defendant.

The court overruled the appellant’s motion for a new trial and rendered judgment on the verdict.

The appellant has assigned for error the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

The motion for a new trial was prepared with great care and particularity, and assigned many causes, but the questions mainly discussed and relied upon by counsel for appellant relate to the admission of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hynds v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Lane v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  3. McLaren v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Cooley v. BraytonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  5. Morgan v. VarickNew York Supreme Court · 1832

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Perry, Matthews-Buskirk Stone Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Splahn v. GillespieIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Wadge v. KittlesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Krug v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API