Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Siewert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 2011No. 2011-1400PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Michael Howard Siewert of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0012995, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1984. In 1988, this court suspended Siewert’s license to practice law for 24 months, with 18 months stayed on conditions, for neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him, failing to seek his client’s lawful objectives, failing to carry out a contract of employment for professional services, causing prejudice or damage to his client, and failing to assist in an investigation of professional misconduct. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Siewert (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 172, 532…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. PaxtonOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DePietroOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RessingOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. SiewertOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DetweilerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. HinesOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Akron Bar Assn. v. Fortado (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API