Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Siewert

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988No. D.D. 88-11PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, this court concurs that respondent violated DR 6-101 (A)(3), 7-101(A)(l), 7401(A)(2), 7401(A)(3), and Gov. Bar R. V(5). However, in light of respondent’s admitted alcoholism and his stated desire to obtain treatment for it, we believe the board’s recommendation to be in*174appropriate under the circumstances. Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, but that eighteen months of this penalty be suspended so that, if a monitor of his progress recommends same, respondent may be readmitted after six…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. SiewertOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. SiewertOhio Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API