Legal Opinion

Hoops v. United Telephone Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1990No. 88-1871PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The appellant sets forth two propositions of law:

“Proposition of Law No. 1: Section 5 of Article I of the Constitution of Ohio guarantees the right of trial by jury in those cases of the kind triable by a jury prior to its adoption.”
“Proposition of Law No. 2: R.C. 4101.17 establishes a civil action for damages of the kind triable by a jury prior to the adoption of Section 5 of Article I of the Constitution of Ohio.”

We shall discuss both of these propositions together in answering the basic query whether a jury trial is made available to a claimant in an action pursuant to R.C. 4101.17…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fawcett v. G. C. Murphy & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Armstrong v. Marathon Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Belding v. State Ex Rel. HeifnerOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Pokorny v. Local No. 310, International Hod Carriers Building & Common Laborers UnionOhio Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Elek v. Huntington National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Manofsky v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Leininger v. Pioneer National LatexOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Grey v. Walgreen Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Russo v. McDonnellOhio Supreme Court · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API