City of Phoenix v. Landrum & Mills Realty Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DE CONCINI, Justice.
This case arose from the protest of defendant, William Larson, a taxpayer of the City of Phoenix, against the action of the city council in leasing certain real property owned by the city to- plaintiff Landrum and Mills Realty Company, a corporation. The realty company, as plaintiff and hereinafter referred to as appellee, brought an action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, sections 27-701 to 27-706, A.C.A.1939, and secured judgment of the lower court upholding the validity of the lease. The facts are not in dispute and are set forth in an ag;reed statement of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Evans v. BlankenshipArizona Supreme Court · 1895
- Cartersville Improvement, Gas & Water Co. v. Mayor of CartersvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- City of Winchester v. Winchester Water Works Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Cabot v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- City of Evanston v. RobinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Tempe v. Pilot Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Stone v. City of PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.