Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Landrum & Mills Realty Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1951No. 5462PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE CONCINI, Justice.

This case arose from the protest of defendant, William Larson, a taxpayer of the City of Phoenix, against the action of the city council in leasing certain real property owned by the city to- plaintiff Landrum and Mills Realty Company, a corporation. The realty company, as plaintiff and hereinafter referred to as appellee, brought an action under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, sections 27-701 to 27-706, A.C.A.1939, and secured judgment of the lower court upholding the validity of the lease. The facts are not in dispute and are set forth in an ag;reed statement of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Evans v. BlankenshipArizona Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Cartersville Improvement, Gas & Water Co. v. Mayor of CartersvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  5. City of Winchester v. Winchester Water Works Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cabot v. Assessors of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  3. City of Evanston v. RobinsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. City of Tempe v. Pilot Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Stone v. City of PrescottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API