Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Fire Commissioner

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 25, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to retire the petitioner on a pension, under St. 1913, c. 800. The first section of the statute reads: “ Any member of the fire department of the City of Boston who has performed service in that department for a period of not less than twenty-five years and who has reached the age of fifty-five years shall, upon his own petition to the fire commissioner, be retired and placed upon the pension roll.” The petitioner was duly appointed a blacksmith’s helper in the repair division or repair shop branch of the fire department in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Devney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Fickett v. Boston Firemen's Relief FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doten v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  2. Rose v. Boston Firemen's Relief FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Washington v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API