Legal Opinion

Doten v. City of Brockton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 3, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

These are two actions of contract to recover compensation for services alleged to have been performed as overtime between October 17, 1947, and November 10, 1949. Both cases were submitted on agreed facts. Except for a slight difference in the number of hours of overtime worked by each plaintiff the facts in both cases are the same. There was a finding for the defendant in each case which we treat as an order for judgment. Reports to the Appellate Division were dismissed, and the plaintiffs appealed.

On October 17, 1947, the defendant accepted G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 149, § 33A, inserted by St.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fickett v. Boston Firemen's Relief FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Nolan v. Boston Firemen's Relief FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Elliott v. Fire CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bd. of Selectmen v. MUN. COURT, CITY OF BOSTONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  2. Amelotte v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Callahan v. Town of AtholMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API