Legal Opinion

Rose v. Boston Firemen's Relief Fund

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 14, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

By St. 1880, c. 107, as amended by St. 1881, c. 22, St. 1909, c. 308, St. 1911, c. 134, and St. 1913, c. 168, the defendant is “ a body corporate for the purpose of receiving and holding all sums of money, and real and personal estate not exceeding in the aggregate four hundred thousand dollars ” for the benefit of members of the Boston fire department and members of the Boston protective department or their families requiring assistance, or for the benefit of any persons or families of any persons who have been such members and who require assistance. See Ficket v. Boston Firemen’s Relief…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  2. Devney's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Fickett v. Boston Firemen's Relief FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  4. Nolan v. Boston Firemen's Relief FundMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  5. Elliott v. Fire CommissionerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKenney v. DobbratzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Riley v. City of NewtonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API