Legal Opinion
Curro v. Watson
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 28, 1995No. 0:86-cv-02501PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiff Andrew Curro, proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to recover damages from four New York State court reporters. Plaintiff alleges that the defendants deliberately altered the transcript of his criminal trial. This matter is now before the Court on four separate motions. First, plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 37(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order directing, inter alia, the prosecutor at his trial to disclose certain information relative to the testimony therein of the plaintiffs brother.…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. AlomarNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Pruett v. DumasDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
- Diaz v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Fortuna's Cab Service, Inc. v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Molina v. KayeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.