Molina v. Kaye
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
BARTELS, District Judge.
Defendants Judith S. Kaye and the Administrative Board of the Courts (collectively “Defendants”) move to dismiss plaintiff Jose F. Molina’s pro se complaint in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Background
Molina instituted the above-captioned action by pro se complaint dated September 28, 1995. Much of the complaint alleges claims similar to those alleged in an earlier complaint by Molina against the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yevstifeev v. SteveDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Bartolini v. Town of DrydenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
- Ismael Estrella v. Lee Kwok; Savvas Tjortjoglou; Melinda Katz; Jacqeline Frank; Jordan Korb; Jane Doe; John DoeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Mack v. StateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999