Legal Opinion
Fortuna's Cab Service, Inc. v. City of Camden
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 20, 2003No. Civil Action 02-5605 (JEI)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, District Judge.
This matter appears before the Court on Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). We will grant Defendants’ motions to dismiss.
I
Plaintiffs in this matter are various cab companies operating in Camden, including Fortuna’s Cab Service. Defendants include the City of Camden and New Jersey Transit Corporation. Plaintiffs allege that various actions of the Defendants have deprived Plaintiffs of their civil rights in the conduct of their business and constitute a taking of their…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McNiff v. Asset Management Specialists, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Wisniewski v. Rodale, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Bartal v. Borough of LaureldaleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- KOUTZIS v. MELLEBYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019