Legal Opinion
People v. Alomar
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1999PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Smith, J.
In these two unrelated criminal cases, combined for the purpose of this appeal, the primary issue is whether the defendants were denied their constitutional rights to due process and to confront the witnesses against them when a Judge who presided over the original proceeding also presided over a reconstruction hearing. In both cases, the Appellate Division found no constitutional error. For the reasons that follow, we agree with the Appellate Division, and affirm in both cases.
People v Alomar
In 1990, defendant Carlos Alomar was tried in Supreme Court, Bronx…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- People v. MorenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ArmlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- People v. SantorelliNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re Karina U.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Khan v. DollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. SaundersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. ShultisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.