Legal Opinion

Reilly v. New York Life Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1935No. 25486. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tolman, J. —

This action was instituted to recover damages for the alleged wrongful cancellation of a policy of life insurance.

Plaintiff Burke was the insured, and plaintiff Reilly was joined as plaintiff because she was named as the beneficiary in the policy. The complaint alleges the issuance of the policy, a compliance with its terms by the insured, and that the insurer, while the policy was in good standing, renounced and refused to be bound thereby, to the damage of the plaintiffs.

The answer consists of appropriate denials and affirmative defenses to the effect that the insured permitted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Reynolds v. Travelers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hansen v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guberman v. William Penn Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Milligan v. Continental Life & Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Lewis v. BerteroWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Vernon v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Milligan v. Continental Life & Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API