Legal Opinion

Milligan v. Continental Life & Accident Company

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1966No. 9719PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

Mr. and Mrs. Milligan, the plaintiffs and respondents herein, instituted this action for recovery of sums they claim due under the provisions of a group health and accident policy issued by the Continental Life & Accident Company, defendant and appellant herein, to the Davidson Service Company, Mrs. Milligan’s employer. Mrs. Milligan, who had previously been an employee of the Davidson Service Company, was re-employed by that company in 1959. At the time she resumed her employment with this company she was covered by the group health and accident policy, although her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a Corporation v. Ruth K. BohlmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Pierre v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Milbert v. Carl Carbon, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Combs v. Equitable Life Ins. Co. of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nab v. HillsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Shurtliff v. Northwest Pools, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Briscoe v. NishitaniIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Milligan v. Continental Life & Accident CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Shurtliff v. Northwest Pools, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API