Legal Opinion
Milligan v. Continental Life & Accident Company
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1966No. 9719Published
1Opinion of the Court
418 P.2d 554 (1966)
Aurora A. MILLIGAN and Claude E. Milligan, Wife and Husband, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
CONTINENTAL LIFE & ACCIDENT COMPANY, an insurance company, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 9719.
Supreme Court of Idaho.
September 29, 1966.
Rehearing Denied October 24, 1966.
Langroise, Clark & Sullivan, Boise, for appellant.
Richards, Haga & Eberle, Boise, for respondents.
McFADDEN, Chief Justice.
Mr. and Mrs. Milligan, the plaintiffs and respondents herein, instituted this action for recovery of sums they claim due under the provisions of a group health and accident policy issued by the Continental…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a Corporation v. Ruth K. BohlmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Pierre v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Milbert v. Carl Carbon, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Combs v. Equitable Life Ins. Co. of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.