Legal Opinion

Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1988No. Appeals 991 C.D. 1987 and 1057 C.D. 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Two appeals from orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) have been consolidated for our appellate review. Duquesne Light Company (Duquesne) appeals from an order directing it to refund excess revenues collected by it for the period from July 15, 1981 to January 29, 1982. Joseph Horne Company (Horne) appeals from the order of the PUC denying its request for counsel fees and fixing the interest rate to be applied to the refund ordered by the PUC at 6 per cent per annum rather than at the average rate of interest specified for residential mortgage…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Nagle v. Pennsylvania Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. BakerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Process Gas Consumers Group v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Independence Blue Cross v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Reitz v. DieterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Pleasant Valley School District v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. SmithCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API