Legal Opinion

Beckwith v. City of Malden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1923PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

Plaintiff, a boy eight years old, sued by next friend to recover for injuries caused by coming in contact Avith a highly charged wire owned by defendant. The cause was tried before the court and a jury; plaintiff recovered, and defendant appealed.

Plaintiff alleged that the defendant negligently permitted an uninsulated primary electric light wire carrying 2300 volts to pass through the branches of a tree easily accessible and attractive to children, and that plaintiff was injured while up in said tree by coming in contact with said wire. The answer was a general denial, and a plea of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Temple v. McComb City Electric Light & Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Williams ex rel. Williams v. Springfield Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
  3. O'Keefe v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Julian v. CalkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Robertson v. RobertsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stark v. HoltzclawSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Town of Clinton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  3. Davoren v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Solomon v. Moberly Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  5. Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API