Legal Opinion

Yarborough v. Alvarado

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 1, 2004No. 02-1684PublishedCited by 3,286 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy

Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 110 Stat. 1214, a federal court can grant an application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person held pursuant to a state-court judgment if the state-court adjudication “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.” 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d)(1). The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a state court unreasonably applied clearly established law when it held…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3,286 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Parker v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

3,281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API