Yarborough v. Alvarado
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 110 Stat. 1214, a federal court can grant an application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person held pursuant to a state-court judgment if the state-court adjudication “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.” 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d)(1). The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that a state court unreasonably applied clearly established law when it held…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,286 opinions
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Knowles v. MirzayanceSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Parker v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
3,281 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.