Couch v. Telescope Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated interlocutory appeals arise from the district court’s denial of defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss consolidated putative class actions. The district court ruled that the complaint stated a claim that defendants conducted an illegal lottery under California Penal Code § 319 and thereby violated California’s unfair business practices law, Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code § 17200. Disagreeing vehemently with this ruling, but citing no California law undermining the district court’s holding, defendants sought certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Yamaha Motor Corp., USA v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- People v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by273 opinions
- Reese v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- John Doe v. Regents of the UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Carijano v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Ictsi Oregon, Inc. v. IlwuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
268 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.