Legal Opinion
Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 29, 2015No. Civil Action No. DKC 10-2747PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge.
This collective action was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., by Plaintiff Jeffry Butler (“Butler”) against Defendants Direct-SAT USA, LLC (“DirectSAT”), UniTek USA, LLC (“UniTek”), and UniTek Global Services, Inc. (“UGS”) (collectively “Defendants”). DirectSAT is a subsidiary of Uni-Tek and UGS, and provides satellite installation services to DirecTV customers throughout the country. Butler is a technician who previously installed, upgraded, and serviced DirecTV equipment at customer locations in…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Carrero v. FarrellyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Hall v. Greystar Management Services, L.P.District Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Goodman v. Archbishop Curley High School, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Dist. of Columbia v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Blumenthal v. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.