Reinbolt v. Reinbolt
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The province of a nunc pro tunc entry is to make the record speak the truth, to prevent the record from showing that to have occurred which did not occur, and to make it show what did occur that does not appear in the record to have occurred. It is not a proceeding for the purpose of reviewing former judgments by the same court, nor for the purpose of correcting errors of judgment theretofore exercised.
An issue was made upon the filing of the motions to “correct and amend” the journal entry, and the judgment of the court was properly invoked whether the journal entry correctly recorded the…
2Cited by29 opinions
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- Webb v. Western Reserve Bond & Share Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Van DeRyt v. Van DeRytOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- National Life Ins. Co. v. KohnOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- McCabe/Marra Co. v. City of DoverOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.