Drapich v. Donovan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners sought benefits under Title II of the Redwood Park Expansion Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-250, 92 Stat. 163,1 but their application was denied because the Secretary of Labor determined that their employer, McIntosh Lumber Company, was not an affected employer within the meaning of section 201(8) of Title II. Petitioners filed a timely appeal of the Secretary’s determination. This court has jurisdiction to hear the appeal pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 2395 (Supp.IV 1980).2
Title II of the Redwood Park Expansion Act provides economic benefits to qualified forest…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Totem Ocean Trailer Express, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- Emma L. David v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Darrell Barnes, and J.J. Schroeder v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Barbara A. Barker v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Karl E. Luedemann v. Hon. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor United States Dept. Of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Danny W. Tuey, and Leslie A. Dehaven v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, Donald L. Scott, William G. Gillespie, Archie T. Lawrence v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.