Emma L. David v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
This is a challenge to the Assistant Secretary of Labor’s decision that appellant David is ineligible for benefits as an adversely affected woods employee, under the Redwood National Park Expansion Act of 1978, Pub.L. No. 95-250, 92 Stat. 163 [Redwood Act], The parties disagreed in their interpretation of Labor Regulation 92.15, 29 C.F.R. § 92.15 (1980), under which appellant seeks benefits. We must decide which interpretation of that regulation should be applied.
FACTS
Emma David worked for Simpson Timber until her layoff on April 30, 1981. Her job involved…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John E. Demarinis v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Local 3-98, International Woodworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Page v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Karl E. Luedemann v. Hon. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor United States Dept. Of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.