Legal Opinion

Karl E. Luedemann v. Hon. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor United States Dept. Of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1984No. 82-7735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Karl E. Luedemann seeks review of a decision by the Assistant Secretary of Labor denying him weekly layoff benefits that are available to displaced “long service” lumber industry workers under Title II of the Redwood National Park Expansion Act (Redwood Act), Pub.L. No. 95-250, 92 Stat. 163 (1978). 1 We hold that the Assistant Secretary applied incorrect standards in determining that petitioner was not eligible for the benefits and reverse his decision. In doing so, we reject his conclusions that petitioner was not an “affected employee” and not a “long…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William F. Lanning v. Honorable Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Emma L. David v. Honorable Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Drapich v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kirby v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Kirby v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API