Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1948No. Civ. 7445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

This action was prosecuted by Alvin E. Oakes and Lula E. Oakes, his wife, on their own behalf, and as guardians ad litem for their two minor children, Melvin and James, to recover damages sustained by them in an auto-bile collision alleged to have been due to carelessness and negligence on the part of defendant W. E. Baker.

The complaint sets forth six causes of action: (1) Injury to plaintiff’s automobile, (2) personal injury to Alvin E. Oakes, (3) personal injury to his wife, Lula E. Oakes, (4) personal injury to Melvin Oakes, a minor, (5) personal injury to James Oakes, a minor, and (6)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Ensign v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Lawrence v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Ashley v. RiveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Thornburg v. PerlebergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  5. VIRGINIA CHANCE v. Lawry's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API