Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Estate of Liberman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1959Published

1Dissent

Fuld, J. (dissenting).

The appellant widow may be allowed counsel fees in this case, pursuant to section 278 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, only if the decree was made “in a proceeding to construe a will ”. The question, therefore, is whether the proceeding brought by the widow was one to construe her husband’s will. Mere statement that she instituted the pro*534eeeding, pursuant to section 145-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act to elect “ against the provisions of [the] will ”, it seems to me, supplies the answer. And so the courts have consistently held. (See, e.g., Matter of Mills, 272 App. Div.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of SchnitzerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1953
  4. In re the Estate of SchwartzkopfNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API