Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schwartzkopf

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 25, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rubenstein, S.

This proceeding was instituted by the widow of the decedent under section 145-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act. Her right to elect to take against the will has been sustained by prior decision.* Upon the entry of a decree thereon the petitioner seeks both costs and an allowance under section 278 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, claiming that the proceeding involved construction of the will.

The right of the petitioner to elect depended entirely upon the adequacy of the trust created for her benefit by the will. The court found, and it was patent upon examination of the will, that all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re CurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. In Re the Will of CurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  4. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LibermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. In re the Estate of JacobsenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  3. In re the Estate of LibermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. In re the Estate of LibermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API