Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schnitzer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 2, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles H. Griffiths, S.

The instant applications for the fixation of allowances are made pursuant to the permissive provisions of a decree of this court determining a right of election question. The main proceeding was instituted by the widow of the decedent. In addition to the request of the Special Guardian, applications for allowances have been made by counsel for the widow and by counsel for the executors. The respective applications of counsel for the widow and the executors are opposed by the Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York, hereinafter referred to as the Federation, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CurleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  2. In re the Estate of GoldbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LibermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. In re the Estate of JacobsenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  3. In re the Estate of LibermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. In re the Estate of LibermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API