Legal Opinion

Mannos v. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1914No. 22,232PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Dekalb Circuit Court; Frank M. Powers, Judge. Action by the Bishop-Babcock-Becker Company against Thomas Mannos and another. From an interlocutory order appointing a receiver, this appeal is prosecuted.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, C. J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver. Appellants purchased a soda fountain from appellee, a corporation, at a price of $2,200, and, in part payment thereof, executed thirty-five notes for $50 each, secured by a chattel mortgage on the fountain. One note fell due on August 3, 1911, and one of the others matured each month thereafter for sixteen months. By a provision of the mortgage, failure to pay any note at maturity caused all unpaid ones to mature at once. In December, 1911, appellee filed its complaint in the Allen Superior Court, alleging that appellants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Peabody-Alwert Coal Co. v. YandellIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Spurgeon v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Henderson v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Heavilon v. Farmers BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tabor v. Continental Baking CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. McKain v. RIGSBYIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hawkins v. AldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Moslander v. Moslander's EstateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Jordan v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API