Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Reynolds

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1907No. 20,920PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Erom Elkhart Circuit Court; James 8. Dodge, Judge. Suit by William E. Eeynolds against James H. Henderson. Erom an interlocutory order appointing a receiver, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This suit was brought by appellee against the appellant for the appointment of a receiver for a growing peppermint crop on a farm belonging to appellant, upon which the appellee had formerly been a tenant. The only evidence at the hearing of the application for the appointment of a receiver was the verified complaint and an affidavit of appellee. Without notice to or appearance by appellant, the court appointed a receiver as prayed for. This is an appeal from said interlocutory order. Appellee’s verification of the complaint states that “all the statements in the complaint are true to the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. City of Atchison v. BartholowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
  2. Globe Iron Roofing & Corrugating Co. v. ThacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Burgess & Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. French v. GiffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  5. Wabash Railroad v. DykemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Zanes v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Hawkins v. AldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Tucker v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Mannos v. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API