Legal Opinion

New York Merchandise Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 20, 1967No. C.D. 2895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

Merchandise described as a plastic salad set, consisting of a 10-inch bowl, four 6-inch bowls, and a fork and spoon, were imported from Japan and entered at the port of Portland, Oreg., on August 13, 1964. The fork and spoon were assessed with duty at 17 per centum ad valorem under item 772.15 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States and the bowls at 21 cents per pound and 17 per centum ad valorem under item 772.06. The protest claimed that the bowls were dutiable at only 17 per centum ad valorem under item 772.15, but at the trial, the claim was limited to the four…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Laurence Myers Scaffolding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Ross Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Thorens, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. United China & Glass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davar Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Maui Varieties, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API