Legal Opinion

Woods v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1994No. 2285 C.D. 1989; 145 and 346 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

This casé presents two issues regarding the assessment of post-judgment interest pursuant to Section 8101 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8101: 1) whether post-judgment interest can be assessed against a Commonwealth party, and 2) whether post-judgment interest can be assessed against delay damages awarded pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 238. We answer both questions in the affirmative.

Timothy Woods (Woods) brought an action against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (DOT) seeking damages for personal injuries which he sustained while operating a motorcycle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Purdy EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Woods v. Commonwealth Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Deveaux v. PALMERCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Ralph Myers Contracting Corp. v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. ALB. COMMONS PARTNERSHIP v. City CouncilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Albuquerque Commons Partnership v. City Council of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Independent Oil & Gas Ass'n of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Lang v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. In Re Septa Mvfrl Interest LitigationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API