Legal Opinion
In Re Septa Mvfrl Interest Litigation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 28, 2010No. 111 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Before this Court is an appeal of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (trial court) dated December 17, 2008 that granted a Motion to Partially Lift the Stay Entered October 25, 2000 filed by Appellees, a Medical Provider Class (Providers). The trial court granted Providers’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment finding that SEPTA is liable for interest on “overdue” bills under the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1701-1799.7. The trial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gardner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Purdy EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America v. MeenaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Wombacher v. Greater Johnstown School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Houston v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Freedom Medical Supply, Inc. v. American Independent Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2014
- In Re Septa Mvfrl Interest LitigationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.