Legal Opinion

Woods v. Commonwealth Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1992No. 110 E.D. Appeal Docket 1991PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDERMOTT, Justice.

Timothy Woods, the appellant herein, sustained serious injuries while operating his motorcycle along a Commonwealth highway when he failed to negotiate a turn. As a consequence he went off the road, struck a utility pole, and was impaled on a fence. He filed suit against the Commonwealth Department of Transportation (DOT), the respondent herein, alleging that his injuries were due to a defectively designed roadway. A settlement of $65,000.00 was offered prior to trial by DOT and rejected by the appellant. Ultimately the matter was tried to a jury and the jury…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Allen v. MellingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. LaRue v. McGuireSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Fernandez v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API