Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Miller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1947No. 32245PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

The plaintiff here seeks the benefit of the Placement and Unemployment Insurance Law (chapter 48, article 6, R. S. 1943). The principal question presented is this: Was she “available for work” within the meaning of that phrase in section 48-627, R. S. 1943? The appeal tribunal «denied her the benefits of the act. She áppealed to the district court where benefits were denied. She appeals here. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

At the time this action began plaintiff was a married woman, the mother of two children. Her home was at Oakdale. Before her marriage she did housework. After…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Reger v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  3. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. OlsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Burlage v. Lefebure Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Hassmann v. City of BloomfieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mohler v. Department of LaborIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Moulton v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Deptartment of Industrial Relations v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Texas Employment Commission v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Dwyer v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API