General Systems Service, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
The protests enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to merchandise identified on the invoices as “adhesive tapes” of various sizes. Although the merchandise is the same in all of the entries involved herein, the collector applied three different classifications, i.e., as “finished articles in chief value of acrylic resin,” with a duty assessment at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 31(a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, for “Cellulose acetate, and compounds, combinations, or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Vandergrift Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Thomass v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marmax Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Scientific Packaging Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- General Systems Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- General Systems Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Eddyco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970