Vandergrift Forwarding Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
OlivbR, Chief Judge:
These two protests, which were consolidated at the time of trial, involve merchandise described on the invoices as “Lassophane Self Adhesive Tape.” The merchandise covered by *20entry 738147, exported in September 1950, was assessed with duty at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 31 (b) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51802, reading as follows:
All compounds of cellulose (except cellulose acetate, but including pyroxylin and other cellulose esters and ethers) * * *
Finished or partly finished articles not specially provided…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Turner & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
3Cited by10 opinions
- Swiss Manufactures Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Wheeler & Miller Shelford, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- General Systems Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Marmax Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.