Legal Opinion

Hallmark v. Virginia Bridge Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 24, 1941No. 6 Div. 798PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This is an appeal by certiorari [Exchange Distributing Co. v. Oslin, 229 Ala. 547, 158 So. 743], authorized as the only, mode of review in cases arising under the Workman’s Compensation Act, Code 1940, tit. 26, § 253 et seq. The appellant’s claim is based on the assertion that she is the widow of the deceased workman and therefore a dependent entitled to compensation under § 7552 of the Code 1923, Code 1940, tit. 26, § 280.

There is no controversy but what the appellant was at one time the lawful wife of the-deceased workman, A. S. Hallmark, but the evidence goes to show that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hammons v. HammonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Wakefield v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  4. Exchange Distributing Co. v. OslinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Ingram v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex parte State ex rel. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Alabama State Bar v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  3. Alabama State Bar v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  4. Patzka v. HooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Patzka v. HooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API