Hallmark v. Virginia Bridge Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
This is an appeal by certiorari [Exchange Distributing Co. v. Oslin, 229 Ala. 547, 158 So. 743], authorized as the only, mode of review in cases arising under the Workman’s Compensation Act, Code 1940, tit. 26, § 253 et seq. The appellant’s claim is based on the assertion that she is the widow of the deceased workman and therefore a dependent entitled to compensation under § 7552 of the Code 1923, Code 1940, tit. 26, § 280.
There is no controversy but what the appellant was at one time the lawful wife of the-deceased workman, A. S. Hallmark, but the evidence goes to show that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hammons v. HammonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Wakefield v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Exchange Distributing Co. v. OslinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Ingram v. IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex parte State ex rel. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Alabama State Bar v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Alabama State Bar v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
- Patzka v. HooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Patzka v. HooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.