Legal Opinion

Wakefield v. Wakefield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 29, 1928No. 5 Div. 982PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The bill' as amended was for divorce. It was not tested by demurrer. The jurisdictional facts are alleged. The nonresidence- of defendant and service by publication on him as a nonresident are shown by the certificate of the register that copy of bill and summons were registered to defendant, as required by law, and the return receipt of the delivering postmaster.

If it be true that the bill as amended was subject to demurrer, as tb amendable defects, as to averring adultery, the same was not challenged by demurrer. And in this jurisdiction, an allegation of ¡a want of knowledge is a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Martin v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Jeter v. JeterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  3. Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Farley v. FarleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. TissierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hammons v. HammonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Caheen v. CaheenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Wible v. WibleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API