Hammons v. Hammons
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice'.
This is a bill for divorce and shows on its face that it was not filed in the district of the residence of defendant who resides in Alabama, nor in that in which-the parties re sided when the separation occurred. Section 7415, Code. There was therefore a defect of venue apparent on the face of the bill, and it was subject to a motion to dismiss or demurrer on that ground. Prickett v. Prickett, 147 Ala. 494, 42 So. 408; Campbell v. Crawford, 63 Ala. 392; Harwell v. Lehman, Durr & Co., 72 Ala. 344; Elmore County v. Tallapoosa County, 221 Ala. 182, 128 So. 158; Woolf v. McGaugh,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Woolf v. McGaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Harwell v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Cahaba Coal Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Lewis v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hays v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Folmar v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Tri-State Corp. v. State Ex Rel. GallionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.