Legal Opinion

Hammons v. Hammons

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 18, 1933No. 5 Div. 128PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice'.

This is a bill for divorce and shows on its face that it was not filed in the district of the residence of defendant who resides in Alabama, nor in that in which-the parties re sided when the separation occurred. Section 7415, Code. There was therefore a defect of venue apparent on the face of the bill, and it was subject to a motion to dismiss or demurrer on that ground. Prickett v. Prickett, 147 Ala. 494, 42 So. 408; Campbell v. Crawford, 63 Ala. 392; Harwell v. Lehman, Durr & Co., 72 Ala. 344; Elmore County v. Tallapoosa County, 221 Ala. 182, 128 So. 158; Woolf v. McGaugh,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Woolf v. McGaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Harwell v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Cahaba Coal Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Lewis v. ElrodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1861

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hays v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Folmar v. BrantleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Tri-State Corp. v. State Ex Rel. GallionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API