Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Patzka v. Hooks

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided November 7, 2007No. CR-06-2032Published

1ConcurrenceShaw, Judge

I agree with the majority that although Frank Patzka’s petition is styled as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, because the claim he is asserting does not implicate a liberty interest, Patzka’s petition is actually a common-law petition for a writ of certiorari.1 I also agree, albeit reluctantly, that this Court must transfer this case-back to the St. Clair Circuit Court for it to transfer Patzka’s petition to the Montgomery Circuit Court.

In G.W. v. Dale County Department of Human Resources, 939 So.2d 931 (Ala.Civ.App.2006), the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals explained:

“G.W. argues that…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Nunn v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Jago v. Van CurenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Ex Parte SeymourSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Wallace v. TEE JAYS MFG. CO., INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Industrial Addition Assn. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API